MATERIAL SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS
Many times the choice between a rotary drum and a pan pelletizer is dependent upon historical preference. Throughout various industries, one or the other has been used for generations, and there is no need for change. Taking a look at the pros and cons of each can help to make an informed decision.
PROCESS RECYCLE
Overall, a disc pelletizer results in far lower recycle than a rotary drum does. This is ideal in situations where the material goes from a pelletizer to a dryer, because the less recycle that has to be dried, the more efficient the process will be (i.e., the more recycle that needs to be dried, the more energy spent on drying there will be).
DESIRED THROUGHPUT OF THE GRANULATOR PLANT
Another aspect to consider when choosing between a rotary drum granulator and a disc pelletizer, is the throughput. When it comes to running a very high capacity, rotary drums are often the equipment of choice. Typically, rotary drums can handle a much higher throughput than a pan pelletizer can. Where it might take a few pelletizers to get to the desired capacity, it may only take a single drum to reach the same capacity.

PRODUCT REFINEMENT
Creating granules on a disc granulator has been likened to a form of art, allowing for extreme customization and fine-tuning of product. Pan speed, pan angle, pan depth, feed location, and binder location are all things that can be adjusted to zero-in on the size range (among other qualities) of the pellets. However, this also means a disc granulator requires a much more watchful eye than a rotary drum agglomerator. Where one operator would be capable of monitoring several drums, one operator should only monitor a few pan pelletizers.
OPEN OR CLOSED SYSTEM
Another side to consider in the choice between a rotary drum and disc pelletizer, is whether or not a closed system is desired. Rotary drums are considered a “closed system,” because the agglomerating happens within the drum, meaning the vessel can be sealed to help control dust and odor. The disc pelletizer is considered an open system, because the operation happens in a less sealed atmosphere than a drum, though hoods are available for containing material on the disc.

MAINTENANCE
Disc pelletizers require somewhat less maintenance than a rotary drum. Though pelletizers do need to be maintained properly in order to function efficiently, there are fewer parts to be replaced, typically only scrapers and spray nozzles. With rotary drums, there are many parts that not only require regular maintenance, also need replacing now and then. It’s important to note that the performance of either piece of equipment is severely hindered if not properly maintained.
CONCLUSION
While material characteristics (such as how quickly a material pelletizes, particle size distribution, binder reaction time, etc.) can play a role in the choice between a disc pelletizer or a rotary drum granulaor, ultimately, the choice comes down to what works best for the process and material to be pelletized.
For over a decade, EMCC has been an industry leader, manufacturing rotary drum granulators and disc granulators to meet the needs of specific process and material targets. We can perform feasibility testing at our EMCC Experimentation & Innovation Center to help you decide which method is right for your process and materials. For more information, please contact us today!


